Me sitting on my Dad's car

Sans Fig Leaf

Previous
Index
Next

Email

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

w

 

"Caroling"

13 December, 2007

He was explaining a great trauma he had suffered years before: how he had been forced to endure the torture for hours at a time, day after day. And that was why, he said, he hated Christmas music, and had no patience for people who liked to listen to it.

His "torture" had been working in a retail establishment one Christmas season and having to listen to the same bad Christmas music played over and over and over. I might have been inclined to sympathy, except I had also heard him mock survivors of child molestation because "they couldn't grow up and get over it."

Not everyone who says they dislike Christmas music because of some similar experience have committed such gross hypocrisy, but many suffer from the same lack of perspective. As a survivor of both physical and emotional childhood abuse (i.e., actual trauma), who has grown up and gotten over it, I find it difficult not to laugh in the faces of people who go off on long, angry rants about Christmas music.

A lot of these tales focus on one particular song being rendered by some cheap electronic device, which they were forced to listen to again and again. While I agree that anyone would find the situation maddening, it's a bit of a stretch to then insist on condemning all holiday music. If someone who once suffered food poisoning decided for the rest of their life never, ever again to eat solid food, and frequently made disparaging remarks whenever they saw other people eating anything, we would all agree the person was crazy. So why treat holiday music any differently?

Others put forward a religious oppression argument. Intellectually I understand what they're trying to say. Certain hymns and a lot of "contemporary Christian" music can really push my buttons. Religious-themed Christmas music doesn't do the same thing for me. Not even in my mid-to-late-twenties when I was an adamant atheist. Back then I might get upset over someone talking about "taking the nation back for Christ," but then turn around and blithely sing along with one of my favorite recordings of "O, Holy Night."

For a while I thought I was a bit of a freak because of that.

Then, when I was a member of the Lesbian & Gay Chorus, I got a different perspective on the situation. We were singing a classical piece--I don't remember what it was, but "god" was mentioned in the lyrics, and some members of the chorus were very angry about it. During a long discussion of the entire membership, it transpired that the members who were most adamant had never suffered, personally, from religious discrimination.

There were plenty of us in the chorus who had been rejected by members of our own families on religious grounds, or had lost jobs, been denied housing, or any number of other indignities at the hands of people who felt justified in doing so because their religion branded us sinners. And all of us were arguing for keeping the lyrics as originally written.

I realized the reason the lyrics didn't bother me was precisely because I had endured rejection. I hadn't just endured it, I had overcome it. The words no longer had power over me because I refused to give them that power. I also refused to give up well-composed music just because I didn't happen to agree with some of the lyrics.

Admittedly, it's easier for me to do that with something written by Verde, Beethoven, or Mozart, than it is with something written in the last couple decades. So I am most certainly standing in a glass house.

Now I live with a man who has a low tolerance for Christmas music. He doesn't hate it, but he can only listen to it in small doses. Early in our relationship, I learned another interesting aspect of the different ways people perceive music. I have at least 39 different versions of "White Christmas" in my collection, for instance. And while I would never want to sit down and listen to all of them in a single sitting, I don't mind at all if several of the versions come up on shuffle play in close proximity. Because, to my ears, each of those versions, sung by different people in different styles, with different sets of instrumentation backing them--they're all different. I can appreciate the differences, and enjoy the comparison and contrast.

To him, they're all just the same song. While he's willing to believe me when I say I can appreciate the differences, it's clear that he just doesn't.

But then, other friends who are into styles of music that I don't care for, can spend hours discussing the fine distinctions between various songs and bands that all just sound exactly the same, to me.

I've certainly spoken with disdain about a particular rendition of a song that I consider poor quality for some reason or another. And don't get me started on the topic of one particular Christmas movie that lots of people love, but which I despise so much, given an opportunity, I would gladly go back in time and terminate the author of the original short story before the tale was written, regardless of the potential consequences to the space-time continuum.

Because that's completely different.


I write plays because writing dialogue is the only respectable way of contradicting yourself. I'm the kind of person who embarks on an endless leapfrog down the great moral issues. I put a position, rebut it, refute the rebuttal, and rebut the refutation.
--Tom Stoppard

.
Previous  Index  Next  Email
No

Copyright © 2007 Gene Breshears. All Rights Reserved.